Crucial MX500 SSD found problematic
Crucial MX500 SSD disks are problematic, in strange ways they should not be.
Crucial MX500 SSD disks are problematic, in strange ways they should not be.
Need. More. Server. Need. More. POWER!!!
But only a little bit, maybe just enough to run a Minecraft server, which refuses to start on my Raspberry Pi 4 because it has only a meagre 2 GB of RAM.
I had known about Intel NUC tiny PCs for a while, and how handy they can be to have a dedicated physical PC for experimentation. There was a very real possibility that I would have to set one up as a light gaming PC in the near future, so I thought cutting my teeth on a simpler server setup would be a good way to get acquainted with this hardware platform and its Linux support.
Never got the hang of telegraf, it was all too easy to cook my own monitoring...
In fact, when I started building detailed process monitoring I knew nothing about telegraf, influxdb, grafana or even Raspberry Pi computers.
It was back in 2017, when pondering whether to build my next PC around an Intel Core i7-6950X or an AMD Ryzen 5 1600X, that I started looking into measuring CPU usage of a specific process. I wanted to better see and understand whether more (but slower) CPU cores would be a better investment than faster (but fewer) CPU cores.
At the time my PC had a
AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE C3
with 4 cores at 3.4GHz, and I had no idea how often those CPU
cores were all used to their full extent. To learn more about
the possibilities (and limitations) of fully
multi-threading CPU-bound applications, I started running
top commands in a loop and dumping lines in .csv files to
then plot charts in Google Sheets. This was very crude, but
it did show the difference between rendering a video in
Blender (not multi-threaded) compared to using the
pulverize tool to
fully multi-thread the same task:


This early ad-hoc effort resulted in a few scripts to measure per-proccess CPU usage, overall CPU with thermals, and even GPU usage.